Less is more: selective advantages can explain the prevalent loss of biosynthetic genes in bacteria.

TitleLess is more: selective advantages can explain the prevalent loss of biosynthetic genes in bacteria.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2014
AuthorsD'Souza, G, Waschina, S, Pande, S, Bohl, K, Kaleta, C, Kost, C
JournalEvolution
Volume68
Issue9
Pagination2559-70
Date Published2014 Sep
ISSN1558-5646
KeywordsAcinetobacter, Bacteria, Biosynthetic Pathways, Escherichia coli, Genes, Bacterial, Genes, Essential, Metabolic Networks and Pathways
Abstract

Bacteria that have adapted to nutrient-rich, stable environments are typically characterized by reduced genomes. The loss of biosynthetic genes frequently renders these lineages auxotroph, hinging their survival on an environmental uptake of certain metabolites. The evolutionary forces that drive this genome degradation, however, remain elusive. Our analysis of 949 metabolic networks revealed auxotrophies are likely highly prevalent in both symbiotic and free-living bacteria. To unravel whether selective advantages can account for the rampant loss of anabolic genes, we systematically determined the fitness consequences that result from deleting conditionally essential biosynthetic genes from the genomes of Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter baylyi in the presence of the focal nutrient. Pairwise competition experiments with each of 20 mutants auxotrophic for different amino acids, vitamins, and nucleobases against the prototrophic wild type unveiled a pronounced, concentration-dependent growth advantage of around 13% for virtually all mutants tested. Individually deleting different genes from the same biosynthesis pathway entailed gene-specific fitness consequences and loss of the same biosynthetic genes from the genomes of E. coli and A. baylyi differentially affected the fitness of the resulting auxotrophic mutants. Taken together, our findings suggest adaptive benefits could drive the loss of conditionally essential biosynthetic genes.

DOI10.1111/evo.12468
Alternate JournalEvolution